Spotlight
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
My IndyMac foreclosure update
July 30, 2008
By Jason Werner
It was widely reported by news agencies on July 14 that the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation temporarily halted all IndyMac foreclosures. Not entirely true.
I talked to Kimberely Smith Rivera, the Plaintiff's attorney in their case to steal my home,
yesterday regarding the status. She clearly denied any desire by the FDIC to temporarily
halt IndyMac foreclosures. She said her client wants to continue with the lawsuit. I
asked if she was working with the FDIC, but she merely referred to whomever the
Plaintiff is now as her client, and not necessarily the FDIC. She was honest though, in
that, she was working with her client to figure out where exactly to go from here due to
the current circumstances.
She did say she might motion for a stay to figure out exactly what is going on. Funny
thing is, she made another argument to the Court on behalf of the defunct bank this
week. By the way, this bank is being investigated by the FBI.
This is now a filthy mess. Plaintiff's attorney cannot even tell Defendant, me, who her
client is. And client wants to continue lawsuit against me. There is nobody to work with.
A simple construction loan turned into a bureaucratic mess by, yep, our friends in the
federal government. Basically, the FDIC is the entity in the lawsuit against me as Its
Successors And/Or Assigns. What a joke.
Christ cut down IndyMac like the grass. I pray He will cut down the new Plaintiff FDIC
and McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC for harboring the former IndyMac Bank’s fraud.
###
July 30, 2008
By Jason Werner
It was widely reported by news agencies on July 14 that the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation temporarily halted all IndyMac foreclosures. Not entirely true.
I talked to Kimberely Smith Rivera, the Plaintiff's attorney in their case to steal my home,
yesterday regarding the status. She clearly denied any desire by the FDIC to temporarily
halt IndyMac foreclosures. She said her client wants to continue with the lawsuit. I
asked if she was working with the FDIC, but she merely referred to whomever the
Plaintiff is now as her client, and not necessarily the FDIC. She was honest though, in
that, she was working with her client to figure out where exactly to go from here due to
the current circumstances.
She did say she might motion for a stay to figure out exactly what is going on. Funny
thing is, she made another argument to the Court on behalf of the defunct bank this
week. By the way, this bank is being investigated by the FBI.
This is now a filthy mess. Plaintiff's attorney cannot even tell Defendant, me, who her
client is. And client wants to continue lawsuit against me. There is nobody to work with.
A simple construction loan turned into a bureaucratic mess by, yep, our friends in the
federal government. Basically, the FDIC is the entity in the lawsuit against me as Its
Successors And/Or Assigns. What a joke.
Christ cut down IndyMac like the grass. I pray He will cut down the new Plaintiff FDIC
and McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC for harboring the former IndyMac Bank’s fraud.
###